The Let's Play Archive

Dominions 3

by Lilli et al.

Part 256: Extras - Mictlan's Opinions about Others - Part 2

Editing this for my own purposes. Also I don't actually knows what the prophet category is either so I too will ignore it. <3

Diplomacy:  ★★★★★
Aggression: ★★★★☆
Management: ★★★☆☆
Army:       ★★☆☆☆
Magic:      ★★★★★

Diplomacy:  ★★★☆☆
Aggression: ★★★☆☆
Management: ★★★☆☆ (2.5-3)
Army:       ★★★★☆
Magic:      ★★★★☆

Diplomacy:  Unknown
Aggression: Unknown
Management: Unknown, most likely 3+ due to his activity on the IRC.
Army:       ★★★☆☆ (2.5ish for non cap stuff, but only relative to other people)
Magic:      ★★★☆☆ (5 for cap stuff, 2 for non cap) 

Irony or Death
Diplomacy:  ★★★☆☆ (+/- 1)
Aggression: ★★★☆☆ (+/- 1)
Management: ★★★★☆ (He's truthfully quite good with resource managemnt, but in late game/micro heavy situations he starts getting sloppy)
Army:       ★★★☆☆ (2 in early game, 4 in late game)
Magic:      ★★★☆☆ (suffers from high cost mages and lack of diversity)

Diplomacy:  ★★★☆☆
Aggression: ★★★★☆ 
Management: ★★★☆☆ (2.5-3 Self-admitted weakest point is micro)
Army:       ★★★★★
Magic:      ★★★☆☆

Diplomacy:  ★★☆☆☆
Aggression: ★★★★★ 
Management: ★★★★★ 
Army:       ★★★★☆ (5 for sacreds, at best 2 for non sacreds, it makes his flexibility limited due to his inability to spam large quantities of troops in short notice)
Magic:      ★★★☆☆ (Only 3 due to the cost of mages)

Diplomacy:  ★★★★☆
Aggression: ★★☆☆☆ 
Management: ★★★★★ 
Army:       ★★★★★ (Jags are hard to beat, and their non sacreds are better than monkeys in my opinion)
Magic:      ★★☆☆☆ (Suffers from weak non cap mages, but they are cheap and one of them have blood)
I probably can't fairly rate myself, so I will leave this unchanged for the most part, just the Army and Magic.

For me, the magic and army categories are indicating how good the nation is in these respective categories, the management is how well they use them.

For what its worth, it's hard for me to rate these people quite accurately on this kind of scale. Mostly because all of these people are very good. For a lot of things we're truthfully splitting hairs by saying one player is better than another at x or y, as almost everyone has a lot of the things that make a player 'good' down.