Part 33: Episode 2, Day 3, Trial: A Matter of Perspective
Part 33: Episode 2, Day 3, Trial: A Matter of Perspective

Some contention on this choice, but the above image really says it all. Mr. White says left, when Miss May said right. (Yes, it would be easier if I re-showed all the evidence descriptions with each vote....but that would be too easy!)

Music: Silence

The music going quiet is a good sign that we're on the right track here. But first, what happens if we get it wrong?

Well, once again, the only dialogue change is when naming the defendant, right before pronouncing them guilty. In this case, the judge stutters a bit due to our unique situation.

The final courtroom shot is the same as when we first started today's trial, with Maya supporting Phoenix and no one in the witness stand this time. Other than that, it's the same old game over scene!

Anyway, back to the dramatic objection. We didn't care about Miss May's testimony conflicting with Mr. White when it came to identifying the killer, so I'm not sure why anyone is going to care about this contradiction, but here goes!




Music: Objection!





Hey, those who wanted to use the floor plans - they are getting used, if indirectly. Unfortunately actually presenting them earlier counts as an incorrect choice and incurs a penalty.







Whoa we rattled him early. Great leap of logic there, Phoenix!


Remember the first episode? The very first contradiction we spotted in the killer's testimony there, was actually the one line he was telling the truth. Could it be the same here?

Maya agrees!




Phoenix just remembered that White is actually the killer and had a completely different perspective to the murder.




Given a difference in perspective... both are right!

Nice, triumph pose already!






quote:
Since both are right, choosing one or the other doesn't make much of a difference. For Mr. White, we get:
As Mr. White has testified, Mia ran to the left.
But... But if that's the case...
Why would she run in the opposite direction from the door?
She did not. She was running towards the door, Your Honor.
Bwah! Now you're the one making a contradiction, Mr. Wright!
Not at all.
No triumph pose, but we come to the same conclusion...
quote:
Saying Miss May was right looks much the same:
As Miss May has stated, Mia ran to the right after she was attacked.
What is this? I am not fashioning fabrications, I assure you!
That lady ran to the left! I am sure of it!
Then there can be only one explanation.
Eh...? And that is?

Music: Silence


I think our best strategy is going to be getting the crowd on our side. Keep playing it up Phoenix!







Two crowd reactions back-to-back! We're on a roll!


Music: Logic and Trick


Looks like we're asked to point on the diagram where Mr. White was standing. I guess technically his testimony would work if he had been standing anywhere in the top-middle part of the room, but we know that he's really Mr. "K" here.



quote:
There are a couple ways to get this one wrong, though either one comes without penalty and as many free retries as you need. Selecting anywhere on the diagram outside one of the colored circles:
That's where he was!
Hold it right there, Mr. Wright!
If he was there during the very act of murder...
That would make him an accomplice!
Impossible!
There was no one other than the criminal and victim in the room!
There is no evidence, no proof to the contrary! None!
S-sorry! Er... let me try that again!
quote:
We can also place Mr. White on the victim's circle...
That's where he was!
M-Mr. Wright! We are not fools!
How could he have been exactly where the victim was standing!?
(Oh... oh, right!)
Mr. Wright! What is the meaning of this!?
Sorry, Your Honor! Sorry! Let me try that again...
As rigged as the system is against us here, they're still more than willing to give us extra chances after we make obvious errors at least.



Music: Silence


Music: Suspense


Why thank you, Edgeworth, for making that point so eloquently for us.

Another triple gavel strike, we really have the crowd riled up now!





Edgeworth is going to try and recover this mess.



We have no real evidence, so tripping the witness up is all we can do. That said, sounds like it's about time for round two!









Music: Silence



Let's see what easily-disprovable excuse he comes up with this time!
Music: Questioning - Moderato








Music: Silence

A plausible explanation, maybe, if it weren't for one little detail.



Music: Questioning - Moderato




I don't think we'll get much by pressing here, but might as well show it off. I'm still waiting to get hit with a penalty for it someday.






You just wait, your arrogance here will make your coming fall all the sweeter.












There's a sound effect like when we lose some health bars, but no actual penalty here.












Just be patient man, we've got this one.




Ugh, you can't prove a negative, that's why the burden of proof should be on the prosecution, but whatever...













Well, that's all of it. Any final advice you two?



Well, we have the same evidence list as last time. What should we use this time?