Part 61: Episode 3, Day 3, Trial: Gentle Meltdown
Part 61: Episode 3, Day 3, Trial: Gentle MeltdownIf we're wrong on our evidence too many times, this day of trial gives slightly different failure text again:




And guilty! But let's not go down that road...

The group is pretty confident in the answer this time...

This choice is tricky, because the evidence itself isn't directly contradictory, but the statement Cody made while we recorded the evidence in the Court Record sure is!
Music: Silence





Sound: Light Bulb
Since we're supposed to be gentle with Cody, I'm going to call that face "gentle meltdown".

Sound: Realization
Music: Objection!



Sound: Realization
Come on, gramps. Digital cameras were all the rage in the late 90s, until they got mostly replaced by smartphones.







I have no idea where this sequence is going. Why would he be lying about bringing his camera in the first place?





Sound: Whack
Anyway, we must be on the right track if Edgeworth is objecting with no substance behind it.

Sound: Objection

Exactly what he said, smug nuts.



Sound: Whack

Sound: Whack

Sound: Damage 2

Sound: Gallery
The crowd is into it. I like the box they got Cody to stand on. Is he using his backpack as a sheath for that sword?

Sound: Gavel





Music: Silence

Is that really any different from his first testimony? Whatever, at least we get another shot at it.

Sound: Testimony 2
Music: Questioning - Moderato


Shout out to the person who recommended I turn on the (partial) transparency for the dialogue boxes. We wouldn't be able to see Cody's manic snarl here otherwise. Looking back that was user Booky - thanks!



Sound: Light Bulb
Music: Silence

More vague testimony from Cody. We know the killing blow was a shot through the chest with the spear, but apparently we'll have to tease it out of him. If he's even describing the real killing and not some preliminary confrontation that took place earlier.


Sound: Light Bulb



Sound: Testimony 2
Music: Questioning - Moderato
I'm going to reverse myself a bit and show the "end of cross" dialogue at the beginning from now on. Narratively I think it makes more sense as a strategy sidebar between the initial testimony and the cross, anyway.




All right, let's do it!



Straight to the point...


Well get to it faster!







Sound: Whack















Edgeworth can't handle witnesses that aren't at his level. Which is basically all of them.




Sound: Light Bulb





Sound: Pong

Sound: Pong


Sound: Whack

We've got one line of testimony left, I'll wait and come back to this one.











Well, not much there.

Let's go back and press harder on the previous line.

Music: Silence

Sound: Light Bulb




Sound: Realization



Counter-objections! Neither of these make any legal sense.



Sound: Desk Slam
Music: Telling the Truth

Sound: Objection

Sound: Stab



Sound: Desk Slam

Sound: Drama Pound

Sound: Gallery
This entire line of questioning seems like a reversal of prior cases. The prosecution can't prove that Cody saw the killing blow, so it might not have been Powers? Usually we would have to bend over backwards to prove not only that Powers didn't do it, but that someone else did do it (and is the only one who could have done it).

Sound: Gavel x 3





Sound: Realization







The first two options are pretty vague, and there's no way an option for "Show evidence" isn't going to get used. No penalties here, so let's see what the first two say before we try and present something.


Sound: Realization





Yeah, that one's a whiff. Also, way to spill the beans you two, Cody can still hear you, you know!

Sound: Desk Slam

Sound: Objection

Sound: Stab






...Not real confident in that answer, is he?

Sound: Realization

Sound: Realization

Sound: Desk Slam



Sound: Whack

Sound: Stab


Sound: Whack





It's pretty clear we have to show some evidence, but what?

Sound: Realization




Here's a weird bug - that line doesn't seem like one Phoenix should be speaking. The judge's mouth didn't move, either. Maybe Phoenix is asking himself a rhetorical question so he can answer himself with some sweet evidence.

Speaking of which, what evidence should we present here?